Bitcoin CME gap: does it always fill? Weekend data since 2019
Test the Bitcoin CME gap on 404 weekends: how often it fills, what happened after the Sunday reopen, and why CME’s move to 24/7 trading in 2026 changes it.
Contents
- 01What a CME gap is, and why it existed
- 02Gaps fill often, but so do ordinary price levels
- 03Betting on the fill at the reopen lost money in this sample
- 04CME’s 24/7 trading changes the question
- 05How the numbers were calculated
- 06Does the Bitcoin CME gap always fill?
- 07Are there still CME gaps after CME moved to 24/7 trading?
- 08Limitations
- 09Sources and data access
- 10Live prior 30-day hourly baseline — separate from the historical study
- 11Related live archives
- 12Related research
| Period | Gaps N | Mean 4h move in gap direction (bp) | t-stat | Moves in gap direction (%) | Mean 24h (bp) | Mean 72h (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019–2021 | 122 | -3.4 | -0.15 | 54.1 | +14.1 | +48.9 |
| 2022 – 28 May 2026 | 151 | +52.3 | +4.52 | 58.3 | +82.3 | +41.2 |
| From 29 May 2026 (CME 24/7) | 8 | +9.0 | +0.26 | 62.5 | +42.0 | -162.4 |
What a CME gap is, and why it existed
Bitcoin trades every hour of the week, but CME’s regulated Bitcoin futures historically closed on Friday afternoon Chicago time and reopened on Sunday evening. Any weekend move in spot Bitcoin therefore appeared on the CME chart as a jump between Friday’s last price and Sunday’s first: the “CME gap”. A popular claim says the price always returns to fill it.
We reconstructed the gap from spot BTC/USDT hourly prices at 16:00 Chicago time on Friday and 17:00 on Sunday for 404 weekends from January 2019 to October 2026. 281 of them, 69.6%, moved at least 0.5%; the median absolute gap was 1.67%. Using spot prices at CME’s clock times captures the weekend move itself; it is not CME’s own futures settlement, which also includes a futures basis.
Gaps fill often, but so do ordinary price levels
From April 2022, where we have hourly highs and lows, until CME’s schedule changed, 106 of 142 gaps, 74.6%, saw the price revisit the Friday level within five days. Smaller gaps (under 1%) filled 87.5% of the time and larger ones 69.6%. That sounds like support for the folklore, but a comparison matters: after a weekday move of the same size (Tuesday to Thursday, 17:00 against the previous day’s 16:00), the price revisited the earlier level within five days 64.0% of the time across 530 cases.
Prices that wander up and down will revisit a nearby level often. The weekend gap filled somewhat more often than that baseline, but “always” is wrong: about one gap in four was still open after five days. A gap can also fill only after the price first moves further away, which matters to anyone holding a position against it.
Betting on the fill at the reopen lost money in this sample
Taking a position toward the Friday level at the Sunday reopen, across all 273 gaps before the schedule change, averaged −51.8 basis points over 24 hours (t −2.07) and −44.7 bp over 72 hours (t −1.18), before costs. In other words, the reopen move tended to keep going for a while rather than snap back.
The continuation was strongest from 2022 to May 2026: over the first four hours after the reopen, BTC moved in the direction of the gap by an average of 52.3 bp, and did so 58.3% of the time. From 2019 to 2021 the same measure averaged −3.4 bp. One period does not establish a durable pattern, and the yearly averages ranged from −39.6 bp (2021) to +84.5 bp (2023).
CME’s 24/7 trading changes the question
CME began offering cryptocurrency futures trading around the clock from 29 May 2026, apart from brief maintenance windows. Without a weekend close there is no weekend gap on CME’s own chart, so the folklore’s premise largely disappears. Since then, the eight weekends with a 0.5% move at the old clock times showed a four-hour average of +9.0 bp: too few to estimate anything, but no sign of the earlier pattern.
Charts and indicators that still draw “CME gaps” after that date are describing the old trading schedule, or a different futures contract, rather than an actual gap in CME’s trading.
How the numbers were calculated
Weekend returns use hourly open prices of Binance BTC/USDT from January 2019, converted to Chicago time so that daylight saving is respected. A gap is the Sunday 17:00 price against the Friday 16:00 price. Directional returns are measured from the Sunday 17:00 price and signed by the gap. Fill checks use OKX BTC/USDT hourly highs and lows, available from April 2022, over the five days after the reopen.
Weekends with missing hours at the required times are skipped. Holiday schedules, when CME did not reopen on Sunday, are not removed, and the analysis does not use CME futures prices or include a futures basis. t-statistics treat each weekend as one observation.
Does the Bitcoin CME gap always fill?
No. About three in four gaps from April 2022 to May 2026 saw the Friday price revisited within five days, but ordinary weekday moves of the same size were revisited 64% of the time, and one in four weekend gaps stayed open after five days.
Are there still CME gaps after CME moved to 24/7 trading?
CME’s cryptocurrency futures have traded around the clock since 29 May 2026, so there is no weekend close to create a gap on CME’s chart. Measured at the old clock times, the few weekend moves since then show none of the earlier pattern.
Limitations
Spot prices at CME clock times rather than CME futures prices; one exchange per measurement; hourly data; holidays not removed. The post-May 2026 sample has eight observations. No fees, spreads, funding or slippage are included, and the results are not a trading rule.
Sources and data access
- CME Group: 24/7 cryptocurrency futures and options trading
- CME Group: Bitcoin futures contract specifications
- Binance public data and archive formats
- OKX market data documentation
Cited sources document external facts or data formats; they do not endorse our findings. The public snapshot contains the table and methods. Source-file fingerprints are included for recalculated datasets. Full archived raw files are not distributed here; fingerprints identify the files used, rather than independently proving the results.
Aggregate data snapshot (JSON) · Markdown · Methods and limitations
Live prior 30-day hourly baseline — separate from the historical study
Only the current watch list is shown, up to 12 assets. Missing or stale estimates remain unavailable. Venue and quote currency are kept separate; beta needs matching BTC data. Hourly statistics are not minute-move probabilities.
Observation cutoff (UTC): 24/10/2026, 14:41
| Asset | Source | Bars / expected | Median |r| (%) | P99 |r| (%) | BTC Beta | Matched N | Last close (UTC) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYPE | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.3477 | 1.8803 | 1.2473 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| BTC | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.1409 | 1.0082 | 1.0000 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| SUI | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.4833 | 3.5596 | 2.1580 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| ONDO | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.4999 | 3.9817 | 2.2199 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| SOL | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.2713 | 2.0082 | 1.4864 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| ADA | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.4336 | 2.9570 | 2.0064 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| AVAX | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.4243 | 2.9471 | 1.8249 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| BCH | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.3517 | 2.5564 | 1.5322 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| BNB | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.1759 | 1.0513 | 0.8796 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| DOGE | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.3019 | 1.9830 | 1.5494 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| ETH | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.1896 | 1.4105 | 1.2100 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
| HBAR | OKX · USDT | 720/720 | 0.4499 | 3.2265 | 1.4532 | 719 | 24/10/2026, 14:00 | Ready |
Related live archives
Related research
Altcoin beta to Bitcoin: BTC, ETH, SOL and DOGE hourly returns
Compare hourly returns, volatility and Bitcoin beta for BTC, ETH, SOL and DOGE using OKX spot data, with sample counts and a separate live baseline.
Will Bitcoin go back up? Every crash since 2011 and its recovery time
Every Bitcoin fall of 50% or more since 2011: how long the low and the next high took, how 2025–26 compares, and which altcoins regained their old peaks.
Perpetual funding rates and annualized yield: a 2025 comparison
Compare 2025 Binance perpetual funding rates for BTC, ETH, SOL and BNB. Funding-rate totals differ from account returns and guaranteed annual yield.
Bitcoin halving and bull markets: evidence from four halvings
Compare Bitcoin returns and drawdowns around four halvings. Positive one-year endpoints in this sample do not prove that halving alone causes a bull market.