Crypto stories need evidence.Open methods · Traceable sources →
C✓WhyCoinMovesTHE EVIDENCE DESK
EN ▾
EN中文한국어日本語
← BTC event archive

Electrum patches flaw that let rogue servers redirect fee-bumped payments

Electrum released version 4.8.3 to fix a high-severity flaw affecting all earlier versions, Decrypt reported. A compromised server could hide a pending payment and inject a fake conflicting transaction so that a user's fee bump paid an attacker; the developer advisory said some servers were running the attack in the wild, with one user reporting a confirmed loss.

Evidence strength Single source

Only one publisher so far. Another independent outlet or an official source would raise it.

ImportanceHigh

Security topic · core coin BTC

UrgencyUrgent

Fresh security news

Key facts

Attributed sources: Decrypt

BTC after this site detected it

  • 5 minutes-0.12%Gate · USDT
  • 1 hour-0.13%Gate · USDT
  • 24 hours—Window not complete
Source published First received Updated UTC

Claims and open questions

What sources claim

  • Decrypt reported that the flaw affects all Electrum versions before 4.8.3, which verifies cryptographic signatures on wallet-owned inputs before adding unconfirmed transactions to local history.
  • Electrum developer SomberNight's advisory states that some servers are performing this attack in the wild, backed by two user reports, including a confirmed loss reported by a user identified as Raju-K12 after a fee bump on October 18.
  • Decrypt reported that the fix was tagged in the repository on October 23 and binaries were published the following day, while incoming transactions from external senders are still accepted without signature verification.

Still unresolved

  • How much was lost in the confirmed case reported by Raju-K12? An on-chain transaction record or an updated developer advisory would establish the amount.
  • When will signature verification be extended to incoming transactions from external senders? An official Electrum advisory or release note would confirm the timeline.

Source evidence

1
DecryptNews publisher
Bitcoin Wallet Fixes Critical Flaw That Redirected Funds to Attackers ↗

decrypt.co

Published 26/10/2026, 17:41 · Received 26/10/2026, 17:45

Market reaction after detection

Measured from the sample nearest site detection, on the same source and quote currency.

Observed returns after site detection
WindowReturnActual sampled interval / source
5 minutes-0.12%26/10/2026, 17:45 → 26/10/2026, 17:50 (UTC)
Gate · USDT
1 hour-0.13%26/10/2026, 17:45 → 26/10/2026, 18:45 (UTC)
Gate · USDT

Historical market context

Closed hourly candles from the 30 days before this event observation. Different venues are kept separate. Research: hourly returns and BTC beta →

Prior 30-day hourly baseline
MetricValue
Hourly coverage100.0% (720/720)
Median absolute 1h return0.14%
99th percentile of absolute 1h returns1.01%

OKX · USDT · Context as of 26/10/2026, 17:45 · Last included candle closed 26/10/2026, 17:00

Event timeline

Source publication, receipt and analysis times are separate. All times UTC.

  1. Source published: Decrypt

  2. Source received: Decrypt

  3. Event first detected by this site

  4. English explanation generated

Evidence levels describe source coverage, not the probability that a report is true. Price moves and their timing cannot establish a cause; minute samples show an observed interval and alert thresholds are heuristics. Explanations are model-assisted, with citations and figures checked. Source titles stay in their original language; full articles are not republished. Methods and limitations →

Recent BTC events and market reactions

Full coin archive →

Get the next BTC event with its sources: Follow BTC by RSS →

Research for this archive